After doing analysis on A-level music video and real music
video, identifying there key features of what makes a good music video. Also
what makes a music video professional compared to home made. When I looked at
the A-level Music Videos I choose two very well made music videos. This was because
I thought by looking at the best end of the spectrum, I can see what made them
A/A* grades. I would also be able to pick out what they was missing compared to
a real music video. The two that I choose were narrative based music videos; I
did this because my group and I are looking at doing a narrative based story
too. I was hoping by looking at other narratives this will give us some good
ideas for ours.
The negatives I found with both of the music videos were
there was no lip-syncing. This might have been done by choose but when looking
at real music videos they had some lip-syncing performed. This is because the
audience likes to see there artist sing. This way they feel like they are
watching them perform if they are unable to see they in consent.
I really like the range of locations that the A-level music videos had as it made the video more interesting to watch and were more engaging. When I analysed the real music video, they didn't deviate from location to location which I found quite interesting. I found it this was mainly because the videos I picked chose to not do this as it didn't go with their pacific narrative they were doing.
Another difference between A-level music video and real music video is there costume. Thought the A-levels costumes were very well thought out especially 'Save you by Matthew Perryman Jones' as the video was set back in time there cloths matched the time period.
I found in the real videos they did overly change what they was wearing most of the time. With not changing the costumes in these music videos matched the narrative.
There was a lot in common with the two videos as they both showed a wide range of camera shots that were relevant to the point in the song.
The A-level music video and real music video were both narrative music videos but were very different in how they told their stories. Neither of the music videos where done wrong, they were just interpreted directly.
In conclusion doing this post comparing the two against each other have been very helpful. As this has enabled me to see that a narrative can be done in different ways and still be affective.
I really like the range of locations that the A-level music videos had as it made the video more interesting to watch and were more engaging. When I analysed the real music video, they didn't deviate from location to location which I found quite interesting. I found it this was mainly because the videos I picked chose to not do this as it didn't go with their pacific narrative they were doing.
Another difference between A-level music video and real music video is there costume. Thought the A-levels costumes were very well thought out especially 'Save you by Matthew Perryman Jones' as the video was set back in time there cloths matched the time period.
I found in the real videos they did overly change what they was wearing most of the time. With not changing the costumes in these music videos matched the narrative.
There was a lot in common with the two videos as they both showed a wide range of camera shots that were relevant to the point in the song.
The A-level music video and real music video were both narrative music videos but were very different in how they told their stories. Neither of the music videos where done wrong, they were just interpreted directly.
In conclusion doing this post comparing the two against each other have been very helpful. As this has enabled me to see that a narrative can be done in different ways and still be affective.
Comments
Post a Comment